Personal Information as Symmetry Breaker in Disagreements

نویسندگان

چکیده

Abstract When involved in a disagreement, common reaction is to tell oneself that, given that the information about one's own epistemic standing clearly superior both amount and quality opponent's standing, one justified confidence view correct. In line with this natural some contributors debate on its significance have claimed can stick guns by relying part first-order evidence functioning of cognitive capacities. article, I argue such manoeuvre settle controversies encounters problem disputants make use it, may be wrong current conscious experience, it live possibility many beliefs are product epistemically distorting factors. also even if we grant personal reliable, when comes real-life rather than idealized disagreements, extent unpossessed provides reason for doubting function as symmetry breaker.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Personal Information Management, Personal Information Retrieval?

Traditional information retrieval has focused on the task of finding information or documents in a largely unknown space such as the Web or a library collection. In this paper we propose that the space of Personal Information Management (PIM) holds a great number of problems and untapped potential for research at the intersection of HCI and IR. In this position paper we focus on the problem of ...

متن کامل

Context as a Factor in Personal Information Management Systems

Personal information management (PIM) systems are information systems developed by individuals for use in a work environment. Seven managers were interviewed to observe how their electronic documents were organized, stored, and retrieved. The purpose of the study was to investigate classification behavior both to identify the features of a PIM system and to suggest whether the factors which inf...

متن کامل

For Bayesian Wannabes, Are Disagreements Not About Information?

Consider two agents who want to be Bayesians with a common prior, but who cannot due to computational limitations. If these agents agree that their estimates are consistent with certain easy-to-compute consistency constraints, then they can agree to disagree about any random variable only if they also agree to disagree, to a similar degree and in a stronger sense, about an average error. Yet av...

متن کامل

Rational disagreements in phylogenetics.

This paper addresses the general problem of how to rationally choose an algorithm for phylogenetic inference. Specifically, the controversy between maximum likelihood (ML) and maximum parsimony (MP) perspectives is reframed within the philosophical issue of theory choice. A Kuhnian approach in which rationality is bounded and value-laden is offered and construed through the notion of a Style of...

متن کامل

Analyzing Disagreements

We address the problem of distinguishing between two sources of disagreement in annotations: genuine subjectivity and slip of attention. The latter is especially likely when the classification task has a default class, as in tasks where annotators need to find instances of the phenomenon of interest, such as in a metaphor detection task discussed here. We apply and extend a data analysis techni...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Philosophy

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['1469-817X', '0031-8191']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031819121000292